ABSTRACT
Background & objectives: Articular cartilage defects in the knee have a very poor capacity for repair due to avascularity. Autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) is an established treatment for articular cartilage defects. Animal studies have shown promising results with allogenic chondrocyte transplantation since articular cartilage is non-immunogenic. In addition to being economical, allogenic transplantation has less morbidity compared to ACT. This study was undertaken to compare ACT with allogenic chondrocyte transplantation in the treatment of experimentally created articular cartilage defects in rabbit knee joints. Methods: Cartilage was harvested from the left knee joints of six New Zealand white rabbits (R1-R6). The harvested chondrocytes were cultured to confluence and transplanted onto a 3.5 mm chondral defect in the right knees of 12 rabbits [autologous in 6 rabbits (R1-R6) and allogenic in 6 rabbits (R7-R12)]. After 12 wk, the rabbits were euthanized and histological evaluation of the right knee joints were done with hematoxylin and eosin and safranin O staining. Quality of the repair tissue was assessed by the modified Wakitani histological grading scale. Results: Both autologous and allogenic chondrocyte transplantation resulted in the regeneration of hyaline/mixed hyaline cartilage. The total histological scores between the two groups showed no significant difference. Interpretation & conclusions: Allogenic chondrocyte transplantation seems to be as effective as ACT in cartilage regeneration, with the added advantages of increased cell availability and reduced morbidity of a single surgery.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: An integrated approach to teaching medical subjects is an effective educational strategy. Yet, this has not become popular in medical colleges in India. We describe an integrated learning programme to teach the gastrointestinal system in the first year of the medical course. METHODS: The integrated learning programme was conducted for 3 years (2003-2005). It incorporated elements of problem-based learning, early clinical exposure, lectures and small group laboratory work. Student assessment was formative (for problem-based learning sessions) and summative (using problem-based learning and knowledge tests). Evaluation of the programme was based on feedback from the students and faculty members. RESULTS: Ninety-six per cent of the students obtained more than 60% marks in the problem-based learning test. The mean (SD) score in the knowledge test was 62 (0.89)%. The majority of students received satisfactory and more than satisfactory grades for their performance in the problem-based learning sessions. The feedback from faculty members and students was positive, which highlighted benefits such as integrated learning of the basic sciences, their application to clinical cases and active student learning. The challenges encountered included the higher input required from faculty members. Most of the faculty members and students recommended that the integrated programme should be continued and extended to other parts of the curriculum. CONCLUSION: An integrated learning programme is feasible within a conventional medical curriculum of an Indian medical college.